Environmental Impact of Tropical Sea Cucumber Mariculture Practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, with the increase in market demand and the emergence of economic benefits, the tropical sea cucumber farming industry has developed rapidly. Sea cucumbers, as benthic animals, have the functions of biological disturbance and potential ecological purification. However, intensive and large-scale breeding have also brought about many environmental impact problems. This study aims to comprehensively assess the environmental impact of tropical sea cucumber farming practices, with a focus on analyzing the mechanisms and degrees of their effects on sediment conditions, water quality parameters, and ecosystem diversity. It also aims to summarize various farming models and management techniques, explore changes in biodiversity and ecological service functions, and present typical case studies of Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and the South China Sea. Research has found that sea cucumber farming at moderate density helps improve sediment quality and promote nutrient cycling. However, under poor management conditions, it is prone to cause local water eutrophication, imbalance in microbial community structure and decline in ecosystem stability. Multi-nutrient-level integrated aquaculture (IMTA) demonstrates a strong environmental adaptability. This research helps to deepen the understanding of the environmental impact of tropical sea cucumber farming and provides theoretical basis and practical reference for eco-friendly aquaculture policies and technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".