MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417479546 · doi:10.5755/j01.itc.54.4.42676

ACT-YOLO: An Efficient Multi-Module Fusion Object Detection Algorithm for Steel Surface Defect Detection

2025· article· W4417479546 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peng Tang, Peng Chen, Ting Tin Tin, Jiaqi Zhao, Zhixun Liang, Cong Hu, Haiying Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Technology And Control · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceBritish Columbia Innovation Council
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Object detectionFeature (linguistics)Key (lock)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionFusionSurface (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of intelligent manufacturing, higher requirements for real-time performance and accuracy have been placed on the inspection of surface quality in industrial products. As a core basic material in manufacturing, steel has various complex surface defects, such as cracks, scratches, and scale, which are characterised by small size, diverse shapes, and strong background interference, posing significant challenges for automated inspection. To address the issues of insufficient detection accuracy, limited feature fusion capabilities, and coupling of classification and localisation tasks in existing YOLO models when processing fine-grained defects on steel surfaces, this paper proposes a high-performance object detection algorithm based on an improved YOLOv8m: ACT-YOLO (Adaptive Content-guided Task-aligned YOLO). This algorithm integrates three key modules: the AFMA module to enhance multi-scale perception capabilities for small objects; the CGAF module to achieve content-guided multi-attention feature fusion; and the TADD module to optimise the dynamic alignment between classification and regression tasks in the detection head. Evaluations on the NEU-DET steel surface defect benchmark dataset demonstrate that ACT-YOLO achieves an mAP@0.5 of 86.4% and a detection speed of 115 FPS. Compared to non-YOLO methods such as SSD (mAP@0.5: 61.0%, FPS: 41), RetinaNet (mAP@0.5: 69.5%, FPS: 15), and RT-DETR-r101 (mAP@0.5: 78.8%, FPS: 108), as well as other YOLO series models, ACT-YOLO exhibits significant advantages in both detection accuracy and real-time performance. Generalisation experiments on the GC10-DET dataset also validate its cross-scenario adaptability. ACT-YOLO balances detection accuracy, speed, and model lightweighting, making it suitable for the demand for efficient, real-time defect detection systems in actual industrial environments, with broad engineering application prospects and research value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformation Technology And ControlSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207