MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417482433 · doi:10.5376/ija.2025.15.0029

Advances in Yellow Catfish Reproductive Biology: Implications for Aquaculture

2025· article· W4417482433 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manman Liu, Liang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquacultureGameteReproductive biologyReproductionGametogenesisReproductive success

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yellow catfish is a freshwater fish with significant aquaculture value. The study of its reproductive biology is of great significance for improving the efficiency of artificial breeding and achieving sustainable aquaculture. This study reviews the latest research progress in reproductive biology of yellow catfish, including reproductive system anatomy and development, endocrine regulation, gametogenesis and oocyte maturation, artificial induction reproduction and seedling breeding, reproductive behavior and environmental adaptation, as well as genetic improvement and molecular breeding. The role of the HPG axis and sex hormones in reproduction was emphasized and expounded. The molecular mechanism of oocyte maturation and the influence of gamete quality on fertilization rate were analyzed. Technical breakthroughs such as induction of labor and hatching were summarized. Meanwhile, the influences of environmental factors such as temperature, light and water quality on reproductive efficiency were discussed, and the potential of genetic breeding technology to improve reproductive traits was explored. Finally, the application prospects of these advancements in aquaculture are prospected, and it is pointed out that these studies provide important scientific basis for efficient artificial breeding and sustainable aquaculture of yellow catfish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFrench-language works237,207