Sustainable Fisheries Management: Balancing Resource Use and Conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ultimate goal of sustainable fisheries is to strike a constantly changing balance between human utilization and natural restoration, ensuring the long-term sustainability of fish stocks and ecosystems while also providing a stable life for those who rely on them. This study reviews several key aspects of sustainable fishery management: ecological basis, policy and governance framework, technological innovation, socio-economic factors, and adaptation paths to address climate change. The article first reviews the formation and connotation of the concept of "sustainable fisheries", and then sorts out the overall trend and main predicaments of global fishery resources. Research has found that maintaining ecological balance cannot be achieved without the basic management of ecosystems, the protection of biodiversity and the scientific regulation of fishing intensity. Meanwhile, new technologies such as selective fishing, reduced concurrent fishing, and AI-driven digital regulation are transforming the way the fishery industry is transparent and compliant. Social-level issues cannot be ignored either. The equity of coastal communities, the roles of women and indigenous people, and how the fishery economy can be diversified are all key links affecting sustainability. In addition, the paper also discusses the position of aquaculture in the blue economy and the role of Marine ecological restoration in the protection system. Facing the more complex challenge of climate change, research has proposed response strategies centered on adaptive management and system resilience building.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".