MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417482686 · doi:10.1177/00220345251387713

Automatic Assessment of Periodontium Complex in Intraoral Ultrasound Videos

2025· article· en· W4417482686 on OpenAlexaff
Logiraj Kumaralingam, Manh-Hai Hoang, Kim‐Cuong T. Nguyen, Neelambar R. Kaipatur, Hung Cao Dinh, Javaneh Alavi, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Edmond Lou, Paul W. Major, Lawrence H. Le

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dental Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Radiography and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDental alveolusPeriodontiumIntraclass correlationSegmentationPeriodontal fiberConfidence intervalUltrasoundReliability (semiconductor)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraoral ultrasound (IUS) is emerging as a valuable imaging modality in dentistry, offering noninvasive, radiation-free, real-time visualization of periodontal structures. Unlike traditional imaging methods, IUS enables dynamic assessments during clinical procedures, supporting diagnostic and treatment-planning capabilities. The accurate evaluation of parameters such as alveolar bone level (ABL), gingival thickness (GT), and alveolar bone thickness (ABT) is critical for diagnosing periodontal diseases. However, current assessment techniques are typically manual, time-consuming, and based on static images, leading to inter-operator variability and limiting real-time application. To address these gaps, this study aimed to develop OralSAM, an end-to-end machine learning network for automated segmentation and quantitative assessment of periodontal structures in IUS videos. The network segments gingiva, enamel, alveolar bone, and cementum, followed by a morphological analysis pipeline to extract clinically relevant measurements. A total of 158 IUS videos from 30 orthodontic patients were included, and the dataset was split into training, validation, and testing subsets following a 6:2:2 ratio. The segmentation performance of OralSAM, evaluated against expert-annotated ground truth, demonstrated high segmentation accuracy across key periodontal structures. Morphological measurements derived from the machine learning network also exhibited strong inter-rater reliability, as confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis, which demonstrated narrow limits of agreement (LOAs) for ABL (mean bias = -0.063 mm, LOA = -0.771 to 0.646 mm), GT (mean bias = -0.063 mm, LOA = -0.24 to 0.115 mm), and ABT (mean bias = -0.002 mm, LOA = -0.104 to 0.1 mm). The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.893 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.864 to 0.915) for ABL, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.768 to 0.960) for GT, and 0.848 (95% CI, 0.806 to 0.880) for ABT. These findings highlight OralSAM's capability to accurately delineate periodontal structures and provide consistent assessments. The proposed framework shows strong potential for integration into routine chairside workflows, enabling early detection, real-time monitoring, and personalized management of periodontal disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dental ResearchSame topicDental Radiography and ImagingFrench-language works237,207