Exploring the Interaction of APOE- <i>ε</i> 4 and PICALM rs3851179 With Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This study investigates whether dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) dwell-time patterns derived from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) can distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genetic risk profiles, specifically the APOE - ε 4 (A+) and PICALM rs3851179 (P+) variants, in cognitively healthy, middle-aged adults. Approach We estimated recurring dFC clusters from rs-fMRI data and quantified the dwell-time (total duration spent in specific connectivity states) for three cohorts: not-at-risk, A+P-, and A+P+. To evaluate the utility of these temporal features, group differences in dwell-time profiles were assessed, and logistic regression with permutation testing was employed to classify genotypes based on dFC patterns. Main results Individuals in at-risk groups (A+P- and A+P+) exhibited significantly reduced dwell-time in left-hemisphere hubs compared to the not-at-risk group, aligning with known left-hemisphere vulnerability in early AD progression. The logistic regression models achieved above-chance discrimination of genotypes, with permutation tests confirming a significant trend when distinguishing not-at-risk individuals from the combined at-risk cohorts. Significance These findings suggest that the temporal dFC features are sensitive to subtle functional brain alterations linked to AD genetic risk before clinical symptoms appear. Dwell-time features represent a promising physiological marker for early risk stratification and warrant further validation in larger longitudinal datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shyamal-Dharia/APOE-PICALM-dFC-dwell-time.git .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".