MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417483664 · doi:10.1177/16878132251401630

Optimal energy-saving controller design for an electro-hydrostatic actuator integrated into a wheel loader

2025· article· en· W4417483664 on OpenAlexaff
Baoyan Hu, Jian Fu, Y. Fan, Zheng Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoaderRobustness (evolution)Energy consumptionActuatorControl theory (sociology)PID controllerController (irrigation)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrifying non-road mobile machinery is vital for reducing emissions and improving energy efficiency. Replacing conventional hydraulic systems with electro-hydrostatic actuators is a key step in this transition. However, developing controllers that ensure dynamic performance, energy efficiency, and thermal management remain challenging. This paper proposes an optimal energy-saving controller, LQFFRO, for an EHA integrated into a wheel loader. The LQFFRO minimizes energy consumption and improves thermal performance while maintaining precise trajectory tracking under varying loads. Simulation results show that LQFFRO achieves tracking accuracy comparable to a PID controller, with position errors within 3 mm, while significantly reducing peak current and voltage. It also lowers the electric motor’s temperature by 2.5°C and reduces energy consumption by 0.395 kJ per cycle, leading to annual energy savings exceeding 2.84 million kJ compared to PID. Lyapunov-based analysis confirms the closed-loop system’s robustness under disturbances. These results confirm that LQFFRO controller effectively balances dynamic performance, energy efficiency, and thermal stability, contributing to the reliable and sustainable electrification of non-road mobile machinery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207