Leisure under lockdown: mutations and nostalgias in times of pandemic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic altered hierarchies of values, social and family norms of coexistence, lifestyles, and consumption habits among the global population, imposing previously unimagined deprivations in the state of the confinement we shared with astonishment and almost perfect synchronization around the world. Our leisure styles were no exception. This study seeks to understand the role of leisure during the COVID-19 lockdowns. It has two objectives: i) to identify the main mutations in leisure during this period, and ii) to interpret people’s reactions to these transformations. Using multi-sited ethnographic self-observation and participant-self-observation records, a group of experts in the study of leisure registered their leisure experiences. Their practices mutated in terms of time, space, and content. In addition, they describe a profound nostalgia for the exercise of freedom, which all leisure practices imply. The study reveals a risk that predominately virtual leisure may facilitate superficial and unequal experiences, susceptible to colonization by obligations and work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it