MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417488929 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202568000006

Microwave Antenna Radiometric Temperature Sensing System for Non-Invasive Deep Tissue Thermal Analysis

2025· article· fr· W4417488929 on OpenAlexaff
Badiaa Ait Ahmed, Marta Cabedo-Fabrés, Jaouad El Gueri, Otman Aghzout, Juan Ruiz‐Alzola

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersCabildo de Tenerife
KeywordsImaging phantomReplicateAntenna (radio)MicrowaveRadiometerInstrumentation (computer programming)Focus (optics)Temperature measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the optimal conditions for temperature modeling in deep human tissue, with a focus on non-invasive tumor detection. A custom rectangular microwave patch antenna and an integrated radiometer system are designed and fabricated. The study emphasizes the determination of the optimal resonance frequency and directivity/radiation patterns, employing characteristic modes theory for analysis. This study integrates the antenna developed with realistic muscle phantoms, engineered to replicate human tissue properties, enabling accurate simulations of microwave interactions. Analysis of S − parameters and impedance characteristics is conducted to evaluate performance. A radiometer, adapted from astrophysical instrumentation principles, is utilized to improve temperature measurement precision, with key performance metrics assessed for subsequent optimization. Integration of an antenna, phantom models, and a radiometer system enhances diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, presenting a promising tool for advanced clinical applications. The antenna-radiometer system enables modeling of temperature distribution at a 30 mm depth within a phantom, with potential error effects in temperature estimation analyzed to ensure reliability. Validation is achieved using fabricated phantoms engineered to replicate human tissue properties. Experimental results from muscle phantoms substantiate the system’s efficacy and performance. However, discrepancies in measured outcomes suggest errors, which are systematically investigated and discussed. The study concludes by assessing the technology’s potential to advance medical imaging, particularly for early tumor detection and monitoring, and outlines future research directions to optimize this approach for clinical deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207