MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417490231 · doi:10.3390/s26010002

Integrating VNIR–SWIR Spectroscopy and Handheld XRF for Enhanced Mineralogical Characterization of Phosphate Mine Waste Rocks in Benguerir, Morocco: Implications for Sustainable Mine Reclamation

2025· article· en· W4417490231 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhak El Mansour, Ahmed Najih, Jamal-Eddine Ouzemou, Ahmed Laamrani, Abdellatif Elghali, Rachid Hakkou, Mostafa Benzaazoua

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOCP Group
KeywordsSpectroradiometerReusePhosphatePhosphoriteResidualLand reclamationSpectral signatureDolomite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphate is a crucial non-renewable mineral resource, mainly utilized in producing fertilizers that support global agriculture. As phosphorus is an indispensable nutrient for plant growth, phosphate holds a key position in ensuring food security. While deposits are distributed worldwide, the largest reserves are concentrated in Morocco. The Benguerir phosphate mining in Morocco generates heterogeneous waste (i.e., including overburden, tailings, and phosphogypsum) that complicates management and valorization, which is the beneficial reuse or value recovery from waste materials (e.g., use in cover systems, buffering, or other engineered applications). Therefore, it is essential to characterize their mineralogical properties to evaluate their environmental impact and possibilities for reuse or site revegetation. To do so, we integrate VNIR–SWIR reflectance spectroscopy with HandHeld X-ray fluorescence (HHXRF) to characterize phosphate waste rock and assess its reuse potential. For this purpose, field samples (n = 104) were collected, and their spectral reflectance was measured using an ASD FieldSpec 4 spectroradiometer (350–2500 nm) under standardized laboratory conditions. Spectra were processed (Savitzky–Golay smoothing, convex-hull continuum removal) and matched to ECOSTRESS library references; across the dataset, library matching achieved mean RMSE = 0.15 ± 0.053 (median 0.145; 0.085–0.350), median SAM = 0.134 rad, median SID = 0.029, and mean R2 = 0.748 ± 0.170, with 84% of spectra yielding R2 > 0.70. In parallel, HHXRF major and trace elements were measured on all samples to corroborate spectral interpretations. Together, these analyses resolve carbonate–clay–phosphate assemblages (dolomite commonly dominant, with illite/smectite–kaolinite, quartz, and residual carbonate-fluorapatite varying across samples). Elemental ratios (e.g., Mg/Ca distinguishing dolomite from calcite; K/Al indicating illite) reinforce spectral trends, and phosphate indicators delineate localized enrichment (P2O5 up to 23.86 wt % in apatite-rich samples). Overall, the combined workflow is rapid, low-impact, and reproducible, yielding coherent mineralogical patterns that align across spectroscopic and geochemical lines of evidence and providing actionable inputs for selective screening, targeted material reuse, and more sustainable mine reclamation planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207