MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417490253 · doi:10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100165

A comprehensive review of hydrogen integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: Configurations, models, simulation and optimization with artificial intelligence

2025· article· en· W4417490253 on OpenAlexafffund
Chenglong Li, Tianqi Yang, Wenchao Cai, Kodjo Agbossou, Pierre Bénard, Richard Chahine, Yi Zong, Yaze Li, Shenglin Su, Guodong Li, Xianglin Yan, Jin Li, Jinsheng Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy and Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesDanish Agency for Science and Higher EducationWuhan University of TechnologyWuhan UniversityChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRenewable energySoftwareEnergy carrierHybrid systemOptimization problemApplications of artificial intelligenceEnergy storageStochastic optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a comprehensive review of hydrogen-based hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs), covering mathematical models, simulation and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven optimization approaches. Emphasizing the potential of hydrogen as an energy carrier to deepen renewable energy integration, especially in solar and wind HRESs, this review systematically details mathematical models for various renewable generation and storage systems, serving as a structured reference for researchers. Given the complexity of HRES modeling, this work provides insights into different modeling software and optimization algorithms, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence methods. The integration of software and artificial intelligence promises to solve complex modeling and optimization challenges with potential applications in different environments. Future directions suggest that the physical model-assisted AI framework, which embeds physical principles within AI models, holds promise for enhancing prediction accuracy and reliability in HRES applications. This framework, especially when combined with stochastic optimization, offers a potential pathway to address challenges in data availability and computational complexity, supporting the effective design and optimization of hydrogen-based HRESs for real-world applications. The overall findings will help improve the design and optimization of hydrogen-based hybrid renewable energy systems for practical implementation. • A state-of-the-art review is carried out on hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs). • Models of HRESs and energy storage systems based on hydrogen and battery are provided. • Different software tools for HRES modeling and optimization are compared and analyzed. • Various optimization techniques for HRESs based hydrogen storage are summarized. • Artificial intelligence enhances performance prediction and optimization for HRES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Energy and ResourcesSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207