MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417490253 · doi:10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100165

A comprehensive review of hydrogen integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: Configurations, models, simulation and optimization with artificial intelligence

2025· article· en· W4417490253 on OpenAlex
Chenglong Li, Tianqi Yang, Wenchao Cai, Kodjo Agbossou, Pierre Bénard, Richard Chahine, Yi Zong, Yaze Li, Shenglin Su, Guodong Li, Xianglin Yan, Jin Li, Jinsheng Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy and Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesDanish Agency for Science and Higher EducationWuhan University of TechnologyWuhan UniversityChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRenewable energySoftwareEnergy carrierHybrid systemOptimization problemApplications of artificial intelligenceEnergy storageStochastic optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a comprehensive review of hydrogen-based hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs), covering mathematical models, simulation and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven optimization approaches. Emphasizing the potential of hydrogen as an energy carrier to deepen renewable energy integration, especially in solar and wind HRESs, this review systematically details mathematical models for various renewable generation and storage systems, serving as a structured reference for researchers. Given the complexity of HRES modeling, this work provides insights into different modeling software and optimization algorithms, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence methods. The integration of software and artificial intelligence promises to solve complex modeling and optimization challenges with potential applications in different environments. Future directions suggest that the physical model-assisted AI framework, which embeds physical principles within AI models, holds promise for enhancing prediction accuracy and reliability in HRES applications. This framework, especially when combined with stochastic optimization, offers a potential pathway to address challenges in data availability and computational complexity, supporting the effective design and optimization of hydrogen-based HRESs for real-world applications. The overall findings will help improve the design and optimization of hydrogen-based hybrid renewable energy systems for practical implementation. • A state-of-the-art review is carried out on hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs). • Models of HRESs and energy storage systems based on hydrogen and battery are provided. • Different software tools for HRES modeling and optimization are compared and analyzed. • Various optimization techniques for HRESs based hydrogen storage are summarized. • Artificial intelligence enhances performance prediction and optimization for HRES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it