MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417492474 · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02417-6

Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of aortic stenosis enhance therapeutic target discovery and disease prediction

2025· article· en· W4417492474 on OpenAlexafffund
Aeron Small, Ta‐Yu Yang, Shinsuke Itoh, Sébastien Thériault, Line Dufresne, Ryo Kurosawa, Issei Komuro, Koichi Matsuda, Ha My T. Vy, Eric Farber‐Eger, Lauren Lee Shaffer, Kristin M. Boulier, Kristin Corey, Megan E. Ramaker, Fabien Laporte, Jean‐Jacques Schott, Solena Le Scouarnec, Sasha A. Singh, Abhijeet R. Sonawane, Harry Smith, Nicholas Rafaels, Jonas Ghouse, Anna Axelsson Raja, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Erik Sørensen, Christina Mikkelsen, Ole Birger Pedersen, Christian Erikstrup, Henrik Ullum, Garðar Sveinbjörnsson, Daníel F. Guðbjartsson, Erik Abner, Jiwoo Lee, Andrea Ganna, Ulrike Nowak‐Göttl, Sarah Finer, David A. van Heel, Johannes Schumacher, Carlo Maj, Baravan Al‐Kassou, Georg Nickenig, Teresa Trenkwalder, Martina Dreßen, Markus Krane, Markus M. Nöthen, Marta R. Moksnes, Ben Brumpton, Stacey Knight, Kirk U. Knowlton, Lincoln Nadauld, Muntaser D. Musameh, Peter S. Braund, Christopher P. Nelson, Tomasz Czuba, Olle Melander, Margaret Sunitha Selvaraj, Satoshi Koyama, Rohan Bhukar, Yunfeng Ruan, Johan Ljungberg, Scott M. Damrauer, Michael G. Levin, André Franke, Klaus Peter Berger, Christian T. Ruff, Giorgio Melloni, Frederick Kamanu, Kaoru Ito, Ron Do, Ruth J. F. Loos, Heribert Schunkert, Quinn S. Wells, Svati H. Shah, Thierry Le Tourneau, David Messika–Zeitoun, Christopher R. Gignoux, Henning Bundgaard, Susanna C. Larsson, Karl Michaëlsson, Hilma Hólm, Anna Helgadóttir, Tonu Esko, Patrick Mathieu, Nilesh J. Samani, J. G. Smith, Stefan Söderberg, Daniel J. Rader, Nicholas Marston, Marc S. Sabatine, Bogdan Paşaniuc, Kelly Cho, Peter W.F. Wilson, Christopher J. O’Donnell, Kāri Stefánsson, Yohan Bossé, Elena Aïkawa, James C. Engert, Gina M. Peloso, Pradeep Natarajan, George Thanassoulis

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsTranscriptomeLocus (genetics)DiseaseQuantitative trait locusGenome-wide association studyGeneExpression quantitative trait lociGenetic association

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular heart disease and has no pharmacological therapies. We performed a multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of 86,864 AS cases among 2,853,408 individuals, discovering 241 autosomal independent risk loci and 3 X chromosome risk loci. We additionally performed sex-stratified and ancestry-stratified genome-wide association studies (GWASs), identifying an additional 5 sex-specific risk loci, 11 risk loci in European ancestry individuals and 1 risk locus in African ancestry individuals. We also performed a transcriptome-wide association study using expression quantitative trait loci from human aortic valves, discovering 54 new genes for which genetically predicted expression influences the risk of AS. We then generated a new polygenic risk score for AS. Finally, we performed gene silencing experiments targeting biologically relevant genes identified by our GWAS. Silencing of CMKLR1 and LTBP4 in human valvular interstitial cells substantially decreased mineralization, implicating a role for polyunsaturated fatty acids and transforming growth factor β signaling in AS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207