MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Study: Contrasting epidemiological perspectives on environmental risk factors for breast cancer in Africa and Western regions

2025· article· W4417494293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J.P.M. Milambo, M S Pululu

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyUniversiteit van die VrystaatNational Research Foundation
KeywordsBreast cancerEpidemiologyEnvironmental epidemiologyCohort studyCohortSystematic reviewPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as pesticides, plasticisers and food-related compounds are ubiquitous environmental pollutants linked to increased breast cancer risk. While substantial evidence exists from Western settings, limited data address these associations in African populations, where exposure patterns and regulatory frameworks differ markedly. Objectives. To synthesise global epidemiological evidence on EDC exposure and breast cancer, with a focus on identifying disparities between African and Western regions. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE) was conducted by Mahasa et al. from 30 November 2024 to 14 July 2025, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search used keywords including ‘endocrine disruptors’, ‘breast cancer’, ‘climate change’, ‘air pollution’, ‘water pollution’, ‘global warming’ and ‘greenhouse effect’, and included both case-control and cohort studies. Results. The search identified 172 eligible studies. Most were from Western countries and used biomarker-based exposure assessments. Most studies were conducted in Western countries, mainly the USA, Canada and parts of Europe, by authors such as Wolff, Brody, Stellman, Eskenazi and Rusiecki, who used biomarker-based methods to assess exposure to key endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) including dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). These Western studies consistently linked higher levels of DDT/DDE, PCBs and certain phthalates to increased breast cancer risk. In contrast, there were only a few studies from African countries such as South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt, despite higher potential exposure through agriculture and food systems, and these were limited in scale and methodological depth, providing less conclusive evidence. Conclusion. Regional gaps in data limit our understanding of EDC-related breast cancer risk in Africa. Targeted research and region- specific policies are urgently needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth African Medical JournalSame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207