Trajectoire du développement professionnel du personnel enseignant : une exploration empirique des relations entre les variables clés
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore de manière empirique les relations entre les variables clés du développement professionnel du personnel enseignant. Menée auprès de 55 personnes enseignantes ayant suivi le MOOC « Le plan d’intervention autodéterminé : un soutien à la réussite des élèves en difficulté d’adaptation », l’étude révèle un lien positif entre les pratiques des personnes enseignantes en matière de plans d’intervention autodéterminés et leur sentiment d’efficacité personnelle à enseigner efficacement aux élèves en difficulté d’adaptation. De plus, ce dernier est associé positivement à leur satisfaction à l’égard de la formation et de l'accompagnement reçus. L’étude permet aussi de constater une relation positive entre la satisfaction du personnel enseignant participant et l'adoption de comportements autodéterminés chez leurs élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it