Long-read proteogenomic atlas of human neuronal differentiation reveals isoform diversity informing neurodevelopmental risk mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract RNA splicing shapes neuronal identity and disease risk, yet current maps lack the developmental resolution and depth to resolve this complexity. Here, we integrate deep long-read RNA sequencing and proteomics in iPSC-derived cortical neurons to generate a high-resolution proteogenomic atlas of human neuron development. We identify 182,371 mRNA isoforms (over half previously unknown) and provide direct peptide evidence for the translation of hundreds of novel protein-coding sequences. Population genetics demonstrates that variants affecting novel exons and splice sites are under negative selection, underscoring the potential significance of these isoforms. During neuronal maturation, we observe that ASD risk genes undergo dynamic isoform switching, including microexon inclusion and intron retention, that remodel key protein domains and regulatory regions. Furthermore, we uncover widespread, long-range coordination between splicing and polyadenylation. Finally, our atlas enables variant reinterpretation in ASD, highlighting the value of an isoform-centric view for interpreting pathogenic variation in neurodevelopment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".