Physics-Informed Temperature Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Decomposition-Enhanced LSTM and BiLSTM Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately forecasting the operating temperature of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is essential for preventing thermal runaway, extending service life, and ensuring the safe operation of electric vehicles and stationary energy-storage systems. This work introduces a unified, physics-informed, and data-driven temperature-prediction framework that integrates mathematically governed preprocessing, electrothermal decomposition, and sequential deep learning architectures. The methodology systematically applies the governing relations to convert raw temperature measurements into trend, seasonal, and residual components, thereby isolating long-term thermal accumulation, reversible entropy-driven oscillations, and irreversible resistive heating. These physically interpretable signatures serve as structured inputs to machine learning and deep learning models trained on temporally segmented temperature sequences. Among all evaluated predictors, the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) network achieved the highest prediction fidelity, yielding an RMSE of 0.018 °C, a 35.7% improvement over the conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) (RMSE = 0.028 °C) due to its ability to simultaneously encode forward and backward temporal dependencies inherent in cyclic electrochemical operation. While CatBoost exhibited the strongest performance among classical regressors (RMSE = 0.022 °C), outperforming Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Regression, XGBoost, and LightGBM, it remained inferior to BiLSTM because it lacks the capacity to represent bidirectional electrothermal dynamics. This performance hierarchy confirms that LIB thermal evolution is not dictated solely by historical load sequences; it also depends on forthcoming cycling patterns and entropic interactions, which unidirectional and memoryless models cannot capture. The resulting hybrid physics-data-driven framework provides a reliable surrogate for real-time LIB thermal estimation and can be directly embedded within BMS to enable proactive intervention strategies such as predictive cooling activation, current derating, and early detection of hazardous thermal conditions. By coupling physics-based decomposition with deep sequential learning, this study establishes a validated foundation for next-generation LIB thermal-management platforms and identifies a clear trajectory for future work extending the methodology to module- and pack-level systems suitable for industrial deployment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".