MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417499257 · doi:10.3390/wevj17010002

Physics-Informed Temperature Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Decomposition-Enhanced LSTM and BiLSTM Models

2025· article· en· W4417499257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Electric Vehicle Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of WaterlooInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersEuropean CommissionCenter of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology
KeywordsResidualThermalDeep learningHierarchyArtificial neural networkScheme (mathematics)ENCODE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately forecasting the operating temperature of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is essential for preventing thermal runaway, extending service life, and ensuring the safe operation of electric vehicles and stationary energy-storage systems. This work introduces a unified, physics-informed, and data-driven temperature-prediction framework that integrates mathematically governed preprocessing, electrothermal decomposition, and sequential deep learning architectures. The methodology systematically applies the governing relations to convert raw temperature measurements into trend, seasonal, and residual components, thereby isolating long-term thermal accumulation, reversible entropy-driven oscillations, and irreversible resistive heating. These physically interpretable signatures serve as structured inputs to machine learning and deep learning models trained on temporally segmented temperature sequences. Among all evaluated predictors, the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) network achieved the highest prediction fidelity, yielding an RMSE of 0.018 °C, a 35.7% improvement over the conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) (RMSE = 0.028 °C) due to its ability to simultaneously encode forward and backward temporal dependencies inherent in cyclic electrochemical operation. While CatBoost exhibited the strongest performance among classical regressors (RMSE = 0.022 °C), outperforming Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Regression, XGBoost, and LightGBM, it remained inferior to BiLSTM because it lacks the capacity to represent bidirectional electrothermal dynamics. This performance hierarchy confirms that LIB thermal evolution is not dictated solely by historical load sequences; it also depends on forthcoming cycling patterns and entropic interactions, which unidirectional and memoryless models cannot capture. The resulting hybrid physics-data-driven framework provides a reliable surrogate for real-time LIB thermal estimation and can be directly embedded within BMS to enable proactive intervention strategies such as predictive cooling activation, current derating, and early detection of hazardous thermal conditions. By coupling physics-based decomposition with deep sequential learning, this study establishes a validated foundation for next-generation LIB thermal-management platforms and identifies a clear trajectory for future work extending the methodology to module- and pack-level systems suitable for industrial deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it