MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417507866 · doi:10.22215/ff/v5.i1.06

~): Reportage dans les communautés noires : Premiers constats tirés de groupes de discussion avec des personnes noires consommatrices d’information dans quatre villes canadiennes

2025· article· fr· W4417507866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eternity Martis, Nana aba Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueFacts & Frictions Emerging Debates Pedagogies and Practices in Contemporary Journalism · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch methodologyCommunity workCommunity organizingWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reportage dans les communautés noires : Premiers constats tirés de groupes de discussion avec des personnes noires consommatrices d'information dans quatre villes canadiennes Eternity Martis et Nana aba DuncanMots-clés : médias antiracistes, médias anti-Noirs, race, racisme, éducation, journalisme, journalisme tenant compte des traumatismes, journalisme canadien

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFacts & Frictions Emerging Debates Pedagogies and Practices in Contemporary JournalismSame topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207