L’écologie scientifique et les transformations de la gestion faunique au Québec, 1961-1994
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après la formation du Service de la faune en 1961, des chercheurs de l’État québécois tentent de faire de l’écologie scientifique la pierre angulaire de l’exploitation des ressources cynégétiques. La démocratisation de la chasse sportive offre aux chercheurs l’occasion d’imprimer leur marque sur les politiques de gestion de la faune terrestre. Les chercheurs produisent des études qui rendent visibles les populations d’orignaux et de cerfs de Virginie, des espèces fauniques prisées par les chasseurs sportifs. Dès lors, l’intégration des préceptes de l’écologie scientifique se manifeste dans les travaux sur la quantification des populations d’ongulés et sur la délimitation de leurs milieux de vie. Cela dit, l’écologisation de la gestion faunique demeure un processus constamment redéfini, comme en témoignent les circonstances qui entourent l’intégration des préceptes de l’écologie scientifique à la réglementation et aux pratiques d’aménagement et de gestion de la faune au Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".