Tu(r)ning AI Green: Exploring Energy Efficiency Cascading With Orthogonal Optimizations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AI’s exponential growth intensifies computational demands and energy challenges. While practitioners employ various optimization techniques, that we refer as “knobs” in this paper, to tune model efficiency, these are typically afterthoughts and applied in isolation without understanding their combined effects on energy efficiency. The goal of this exploratory empirical study is to emphasize on treating energy efficiency as the firstclass design consideration by demonstrating how strategic knob selection across five AI pipeline stages (data, model, training, system, inference) creates cascading efficiency gains. We evaluate 30 experimental variants on ModernBERT, an encoderonly architecture, examining individual techniques and their orthogonal combinations. Results shows that model pruning provides the highest single-knob energy savings (up to 84.6%), while orthogonal combinations reduce energy consumption by up to 94.6% while preserving 95.95% of baseline F1 score. This work provides actionable frameworks for informed green AI that balance efficiency, performance, and environmental responsibility in AI systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it