MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advanced Detection of Helmet Usage and Number Plates in Riders

2025· article· W4417509118 on OpenAlexaff
P. Jayadharshini, Muthuraman Saminathan, Lalitha Krishnasamy, P. Nithya, T. Sathya, N. Abinaya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaw enforcementObject detectionHuman errorData collectionObject (grammar)Automation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most critically, enforcing road safety laws and reducing roadway fatalities from traffic accidents will rely heavily on accurately detecting helmet use and motorcycle riders' number plates. Conventional methods of enforcement rely heavily on human observation and labour-intensive methods, and are problematic as they can be subject to human error under specific conditions (for example, poor weather and lighting). To demonstrate an automated system that could potentially mitigate some of these constraints, we developed a novel automated system by combining cutting-edge object detection models (You Only Look Once, Nano version (YOLOv8n), Faster R-CNN) and EasyOCR (optical character recognition) to assist law enforcement. YOLOv8n has been praised for its speed and accuracy; when developing and training the model, we sourced a dataset with images of riders wearing helmets and other images of riders without helmets, as well as the number plate images to ensure that during training, the model was able to learn both tasks as it related to the helmet use detection and number plates. EasyOCR is an excellent resource for extracting textual data from detected number plates, so combining YOLOv8n with EasyOCR allows for real-time data collection from the detected number plates. This unified platform is a big step ahead in roadway security technology. It offers an easily expandable yet successful way to keep an eye on helmet use and identify and punish drivers who don't wear them, all of which will help reduce traffic accidents and save lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207