Staging a Christian World and Shaping the “Orient(s)” in the Apostolic Palace (ca. 1560–1630)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study, based on largely unpublished primary sources, examines the incorporation, display, and reconfigurations of the “Orient(s)”—a Western-constructed concept encompassing multiple decontextualized cultural realities—within the Vatican Apostolic Palace during the last quarter of the sixteenth century and the first quarter of the seventeenth century. It brings to light, in several cases for the first time, the early modern papal Kunst- und Wunderkammern , the palatine treasures, the Vatican Library, Castel Sant’Angelo and other spaces in which artefacts and natural marvels from Asia, America, and Africa were preserved, exhibited and reframed within new schemes. The Apostolic Palace constitutes a unique case embodying the collections, worldview, and agenda of the head of a religious state in Europe that articulated a Christianized vision of a proto-global world tied to spiritual authority. Particular attention is given to the materialities associated with the Orient(s) and their politico-theological and ideological valences, as well as to their interaction with apostolic spaces and their role in shaping the Holy See’s early modern worldview. The study privileges a focus on East Asia—an especially documentable and revealing context—while also considering the Ottoman Empire, and opening a comparative perspective on practices involving other early modern “Orient(s).” Ultimately, this inquiry constitutes a critical step not only toward recovering and reconsidering dematerialized proto-global histories, but also to assess the Holy See’s engagement with the world through these histories, the construction of Orientalism, and the significance of the Vatican’s ethnographic collections today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".