MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417519859 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-31897-z

A novel adaptive hybrid intrusion detection system with lightweight optimization for enhanced security in internet of medical things

2025· article· en· W4417519859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hasan Aftab SAEED, Mehwish Naseer, Afaf Rasool, Amjad Alsirhani, Faeiz Alserhani, Ghadah Naif Alwakid, Farhan Ullah, Hamad Naeem, Yue Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision treeIntrusion detection systemThe InternetExploitLatency (audio)Tree (set theory)Resilience (materials science)Artificial immune systemFeature (linguistics)Hybrid system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices in e-Health systems has shown improved healthcare delivery but introduced severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including spoofing, denial-of-service, and data breaches. This study proposes leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to secure IoMT environments and further assist in real-time threat detection and resilience of e-Health systems. This provided an improved model that implemented feature importance and ensemble learning, as well as contributed to developing a new hybrid system that uses the pre-trained Decision Tree (C4.5) model that incorporates a pre-trained Decision Tree (C4.5) model into the RL loop using Deep Q-Networks (DQN). This hybrid framework exploits the efficiency and low latency of pre-trained C4.5 for initial classification, and enables the ability of the system to learn dynamically from network interactions, adapt to changing patterns of attack, and improve detection performance over time. The general framework employs SMOTE to address class imbalance, while focal loss is utilized as an evaluation tool to analyze the classifiers' focus on hard-to-classify and minority class samples. It is important to note that the hybrid IDS has exhibited higher accuracy compared to Decision Tree - C4.5 with total rewards maximized, indicating the adaptive learning and stability in changing environments. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.03% for binary classes, 98.55% for the five classes, and 99.56% for the 14-class experiment when using the initial classification with the Decision Tree (C4.5) model on the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity, Internet of Medical Things-2024(CICIoMT2024) dataset. The initial classification and latency results are additionally compared to a few other lightweight classifiers such as Random Forest, XGBoost, and Simple Neural Networks. To bring adaptability and dynamic threat detection of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) classifiers, the C4.5 model was integrated into a DQN framework to address evolving network threats over time. The hybrid model also persisted with improved performance, measuring 99.20% accuracy for the binary classes with CICIoMT2024 dataset. Proposed IDS was also evaluated for its generalization capability across heterogeneous datasets, i-e, WUSTL-EHMS, ECU-IoHT, DF_IOMT, and CICIOT23. The model consistently achieved high detection performance across the datasets and outperformed their respective previously achieved results with the C4.5 supervised classifier, which verified its robustness and flexibility across different IoMT contexts. The proposed hybrid IDS is therefore validated as a deployment-aware, lightweight, and adaptive framework capable of effective intrusion detection in dynamic healthcare settings that are resource-limited and demand real-time responsiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207