MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accessing the Pores and Unlocking Open Metal Sites in a Rare-Earth Cluster-Based Metal–Organic Framework

2025· article· en· W4417519975 on OpenAlex
Hudson A. Bicalho, Clara V. Diniz, Zoey Davis, Christopher Copeman, Ashlee J. Howarth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Materials Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsLigand (biochemistry)MetalMetal-organic frameworkSolventCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While postsynthetic modification (PSM) of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) through solvent assisted ligand incorporation (SALI) has been extensively studied, particularly in Zr 6 -based MOFs, this PSM approach is largely overlooked in the literature on rare-earth (RE) cluster-based MOFs. In this work, we explore SALI in Y-CU-45 (CU = Concordia University), a Y 6 -MOF analogous to Zr-MOF-808 with a 6-connected Y 6 -node. The structural connectivity of Y-CU-45 allows for the existence of six coordinatively unsaturated sites per cluster. We previously demonstrated that these sites are capped by modulators used in the synthesis of Y-CU-45, which partially occlude the pores of the MOF. By performing SALI on Y-CU-45 with seven different ligands: formate, acetate, trifluoroacetate, pivalate, benzoate, 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorobenzoate, and 2,6-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzoate, we demonstrate that the pores and open metal sites of Y-CU-45 can be made more accessible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it