MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417520271 · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5cunj_v1

Stress, Recovery, and Epigenetic Transmission: Psychological Mechanisms and Implications for Education and Intergenerational Health

2025· article· W4417520271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rony Moortgat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsCognitionWorkloadDNA methylationConfoundingSocioeconomic statusMental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Youth suffer due to chronic psychological stress, which affects cognition and mental health. Stress effects may be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, histone modulation, telomere dynamics, and be transmitted through the generations. There is still some evidence that is missing on the topic of stress, recovery, and epigenetics in education.Objective: The present scoping review is a map of evidence that provides the relationship between psychological stress, recovery, and epigenetic modifications among youth aged between three years to eighteen years; methodological gaps; and policy implications of education.Methods: The literature based on systematic search of five databases (2020-2025) was found. In accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, fifty studies were evaluated in terms of quality with AMSTAR 2, Joanna Briggs Institute, and Newcastle-Ottawa scales.Results: DNA methylation patterns suggestive of inflammation, worse cognitive functioning, and faster biological aging in adolescents were linked with socioeconomic deprivation. Epigenetic buffering potential is demonstrated on sleep, physical activity, and mindfulness, but there is no dose-response. Multigenerational transmission in animals has been exhibited in four generations; in humans, evidence exists, but the transmission is still weak due to confounding factors. Conclusion: There should be no-regret policies put into practice by the educational policy; that is, sleep-protective schedules, workload pacing, rest-recovery spaces, with higher priority to high-stress schools. Convergent research involving psychology, epigenetics, pedagogy, and ethics is able to contribute to causal knowledge whilst considering the needs in development and the ethical limits.KeywordsAcademic stress, epigenetics, DNA methylation, recovery, intergenerational transmission, adolescent health, educational policy, precautionary principle

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→