MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417520449 · doi:10.1016/j.ssnmr.2025.102060

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si78.svg" display="inline" id="d1e1366"> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> </mml:math> couplings in the solid state from direct energy computations

2025· article· en· W4417520449 on OpenAlex
Josef W. Zwanziger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSolid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsComputationEnergy (signal processing)MoleculeSolid-stateSimple (philosophy)Range (aeronautics)Variety (cybernetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple method for computing J couplings from first principles is proposed, implemented, and tested. In this approach the coupling, which is just the mixed second derivative of the energy with respect to two nuclear magnetic dipoles, is evaluated non-perturbatively by computing the total energy with different fixed dipoles of various orientations, combined in a finite difference scheme. The approach is equally applicable to molecules and solids. Details of the implementation are presented, and a variety of examples in molecules and solids are provided. • The J coupling tensor is determined directly from energy calculations. • The method is implemented in a code optimized for solids. • The method scales well with system size and can use a variety of functionals. • The results are validated against experimental results and other codes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it