MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417520617 · doi:10.1002/1744-9987.70106

The Safety and Efficacy of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2025· review· en· W4417520617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zehao Zhang, Yaqi Wang, Lecheng She, Xiaolan Chen, Ming Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFourth Military Medical University
KeywordsMetabolic alkalosisIncidence (geometry)MEDLINEPlasma concentrationAlkalosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is increasingly utilized for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Currently, many clinical studies have focused on the safety and efficacy of RCA in TPE. However, due to the complex application and the lack of a uniform standard of RCA, the results of these researches, especially citrate-related metabolic complications, varied greatly in different studies. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and efficacy of RCA in TPE. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database from the inception to August 26, 2024. Studies regarding the application of RCA in TPE were included to assess the efficacy and safety of RCA in TPE. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad scale. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (version 15.1). RESULTS: There were 13 eligible studies included, involving 4268 RCA-TPE sessions. The pooled rate of extracorporeal circuit clotting, bleeding, citrate accumulation, hypocalcemia, hypernatremia, hypomagnesemia, and metabolic alkalosis was 5.3% (95% CI [2.4-9.2]), 2.0% (95% CI [0.2-5.0]), 1.8% (95% CI [0.0-6.7]), 17.9% (95% CI [2.3-42.5]), 1.7% (95% CI [0.0-5.1]), 45.6% (95% CI [25.9-66.0]), and 14.8% (95% CI [0.5-41.3]), respectively. Subgroup analysis of hypocalcemia and metabolic alkalosis in the membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE) was 42.1% (95% CI [2.5-89.7]) and 32.4% (95% CI [25.3-39.9]), respectively. Compared to before treatment, the serum sodium and bicarbonate significantly increased, and serum calcium decreased significantly after RCA-TPE treatment. There was no difference in platelet (PLT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), the ratio of total calcium to ionized calcium, total calcium, pH, and base excess (BE) before and after treatment. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that pH and BE in mTPE, and APTT and PT in double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) were significantly increased after treatment. CONCLUSION: Regional citrate anticoagulation might be effective in TPE treatments. However, the incidence of hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and metabolic alkalosis is relatively high. Close monitoring and timely adjustment are needed during the process of RCA-TPE treatment to avoid these complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.037
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Apheresis and DialysisSame topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207