Bordering Monuments and Monumentalized Borders: Borderscapes and Public Memory in Trentino, Italy, after World War One (1919–1945)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the concept of “borderscape” is used as a methodological tool to examine a series of architectural and infrastructural public projects commissioned in Trentino (Italy) during the interwar period to preserve the collective memory of the First World War. At a time when the northeastern border of Italy was undergoing a process of redrawing, the region became a potential borderscape where the questions of monumentalization, representation, and perception of borders became urgent. Rather than focusing on individual monuments or infrastructures as isolated case studies, the article explores their intertwined histories – all of which are inextricably linked to the burning need to process grief – and situates them in a dialogue with that of the surrounding landscape, thereby illuminating border aesthetics and their evolving dynamics anew. The integration of documentary and photographic sources will facilitate an interdisciplinary exploration of the historical evolution of architecture, urbanism, art, and the Alpine landscape and environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".