MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417526589 · doi:10.28914/atlantis-2025-47.2.8

Representing and Narrating the Self across Media: Vivek Shraya’s Artist Persona

2025· article· en· W4417526589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karolína Zlámalová

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAutobiographical and Biographical Writing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit Utrecht
KeywordsPersonaScholarshipComicsSelfContent (measure theory)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing primarily on life-writing scholarship and persona studies, and paying particular attention to the different media affordances, this article traces the autobiographical elements in the oeuvre of Canadian multigenre artist Vivek Shraya. It identifies how Shraya utilizes autobiographical content in various media, platforms, and modes—e.g., essays, a comic book, a play, photography, and Instagram—as one of the tools to create her artist persona. The article argues that through the prolific production of episodical, interconnected and occasionally inconsistent life writing and automedia, Shraya navigates the contemporary pressures on a celebrity artist, particularly one in an intersectionally precarious position: frequent content production, self-commodification and providing the audience with access to their private life. Through a discussion of Shraya’s autobiographical production, this article exemplifies the impact of the digital forms of self-representation on contemporary autobiographical expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American StudiesSame topicAutobiographical and Biographical WritingFrench-language works237,207