MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417526946 · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2025.106237

From gut to glee: Is butyrate a promising antidepressant? A systematic review and mechanistic insights

2025· article· en· W4417526946 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vera Korenblik, N. Schilder, Ilke G.S. de Lange, Joost G. Daams, Claudi Bockting, Stanley Brul, Max Nieuwdorp, Anja Lok, Anikó Kőrösi

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior and Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit van AmsterdamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
KeywordsButyrateClinical trialDepression (economics)Gut–brain axisSystematic reviewMoodGut floraTumor necrosis factor alpha

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Despite available therapies for depression, many patients do not achieve adequate improvement, illustrating the need for innovative treatment strategies. Nutritional psychiatry is an emerging area, with increasing evidence that microbially derived butyrate contributes to the beneficial effects of dietary, pre-, pro- and synbiotics interventions - raising the exciting possibility that direct butyrate administration might alleviate depressive symptoms. The main objective was to systematically review the effects of butyrate on depressive symptoms in humans and depressive-like behavior in animals (PROSPERO; CRD42023g0739). METHODS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, ICTPR and ClinicalTrials.gov up to October 2025. Studies were included if they examined depressive symptoms in humans or relevant behaviors in animal models of depression/anxiety, involved treatment with butyrate formulations, included a control or pre-post comparison, and reported behavioral or clinical outcomes. Eligible designs included case-control, cohort, (randomized) controlled trials, experimental, or in vivo studies published in English or Dutch. Studies were excluded if depression was not the primary focus or if butyrate was combined with another treatment. Risk of bias was assessed with SYRCLE for animal studies and RoB 2 for the human studies. RESULTS: Of the two randomized controlled trials, one found no measurable effect of 1-week oral butyrate in healthy males, whereas the other found reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis after 12-weeks oral butyrate. Thirty-two animal studies showed that butyrate generally modulated depressive- and anxiety-like phenotypes in rodents, potentially via anti-inflammatory, neuroplastic, epigenetic and gut-mediated mechanisms. DISCUSSION: Preclinical findings support the therapeutic promise of butyrate as a novel intervention for depression, warranting further clinical investigation. ABBREVIATIONS: BDNF, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CRS, Chronic restraint stress; CSD, Chronic social defeat; CUMS, Chronic unpredictable mild stress; DASS, Depression, anxiety, Stress Scales; EPM, Elevated plus maze; FMT, Fecal microbiota transplant; FST, Forced swim test; HDAC, Histone deacetylase; HFD, High-fat diet; HPA, Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; ICTRP International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; IL, Interleukin; LDB, Light-dark box; LEIDS-R, Leiden Index of Depression Severity-Revised; LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; MD, Maternal deprivation; MDD, Major depressive disorder; MGBA, Microbiota-gut-brain axis; NORT, Novel object recognition test; OFT, Open field test; PFC, Prefrontal cortex; PRISMA Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; SCFA, Short-chain fatty acid; SPT, Sucrose preference test; SYRCLE, Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation; TCA, Tricarboxylic acid; TNF, Tumor necrosis factor; TST, Tail suspension test; ZO-1, Zonulin-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior and ImmunitySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207