MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417531211 · doi:10.5430/wje.v15n4p91

Teacher's Perspective on Generative Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovation of Vocational Undergraduate Teaching Models in Road and Bridge Engineering—An Empirical Study Based on Structural Equation Modeling

2025· article· W4417531211 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationStructural equation modelingBridge (graph theory)Empirical researchGenerative grammarPerceptionLiteracyGenerative model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the role mechanism of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in empowering the innovation of vocational undergraduate teaching modes in road and bridge engineering from the teachers' perspective. Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Constructivist Learning Theory (CLT), and Engineering Education Theory (EET), a multidimensional Structural Equation Model (SEM) is constructed, covering Teaching AI Literacy (TAL), Generative AI Use Behavior (GAU), Teaching Perception of Adaptation (TPA), Learning Engagement (LE), Learning Outcomes (LO), Engineering Problem Solving Skills (EPS), Teaching Satisfaction (TS), Ethical Risk Perception (ERP), and College-Company Collaboration Intensity (CCI) as a contextual moderating variable. Taking all 54 teachers of the road and bridge engineering program at Qinghai Vocational and Technical University as the empirical sample, the study showed that teachers' AI literacy significantly contributed to AI usage behavior and students' learning engagement; AI usage behavior further positively affected learning engagement by enhancing teachers' teaching perception of adaptation; and learning engagement significantly and positively impacted the students' learning outcomes, which in turn improved their engineering problem-solving ability and teaching satisfaction. The increase in learning engagement also considerably enhanced students' ability to perceive the ethical risks of AI. The intensity of school-enterprise collaboration (CCI) as a contextual variable was significantly and positively correlated with both teacher AI literacy TAL and generative AI usage behavior (GAU). This study has significant practical implications for the generative AI-driven reform of vocational undergraduate teaching modes and school-enterprise synergy in road and bridge engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207