MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417531363 · doi:10.36253/rar-19125

Per una chiesa di massa. Edifici religiosi tra teorie e progetti nell’opera di Apollonj Ghetti /

2025· article· it· W4417531363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRestauro Archeologico · 2025
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Humor Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipWitnessFaithContext (archaeology)ArchitectureChristian faith

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the magazine Faith and Art, Bruno Maria Apollonj Ghetti published a series of articles reflecting on the role of sacred buildings in the context of Catholic ecumenism in the twentieth century. The aim was to critically address the themes of architecture for worship and its spatial meanings. The opportunity to put these theories into practice first arose with the renovation of the interior of St. Paul's Cathedral in Brazil, and then through two experiences of new construction projects: the Church of Our Lady of the Most Holy Sacrament and Canadian Martyrs in Rome, St. Elizabeth's in Salzburg, projects developed between 1950 and 1955. These buildings bear witness to the attempt to realise a religious utopia which today, some seventy years after their construction, is faced with the need for conservation work. The materials, forms and volumes typical of modern architectural trends are now aspects that need to be addressed to ensure conservation that does not distort the constructional characteristics and material authenticity of this heritage. The paper examines the theoretical contribution and operational results of the architect in the construction of religious buildings, reflecting on strategies for possible restoration work to be carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRestauro ArcheologicoSame topicAmerican Literature and Humor StudiesFrench-language works237,207