Per una chiesa di massa. Edifici religiosi tra teorie e progetti nell’opera di Apollonj Ghetti /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the magazine Faith and Art, Bruno Maria Apollonj Ghetti published a series of articles reflecting on the role of sacred buildings in the context of Catholic ecumenism in the twentieth century. The aim was to critically address the themes of architecture for worship and its spatial meanings. The opportunity to put these theories into practice first arose with the renovation of the interior of St. Paul's Cathedral in Brazil, and then through two experiences of new construction projects: the Church of Our Lady of the Most Holy Sacrament and Canadian Martyrs in Rome, St. Elizabeth's in Salzburg, projects developed between 1950 and 1955. These buildings bear witness to the attempt to realise a religious utopia which today, some seventy years after their construction, is faced with the need for conservation work. The materials, forms and volumes typical of modern architectural trends are now aspects that need to be addressed to ensure conservation that does not distort the constructional characteristics and material authenticity of this heritage. The paper examines the theoretical contribution and operational results of the architect in the construction of religious buildings, reflecting on strategies for possible restoration work to be carried out.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".