MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early Acute Management in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health-Care Providers. Who Should Read It?

2008· letter· en· W44648598 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Wing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineSpinal cord injuryRehabilitationHealth careClinical PracticeIntensive care medicineBest practiceAcute careWindow of opportunityPhysical therapyMedical emergencySpinal cordPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health-Care Providers,'' focuses on caring for patients during the first crucial 72 hours after spinal cord injury (SCI). During this time, the diagnosis of SCI is being established in an individual who may have multiple serious and possibly life-threatening injuries. While the priority is to render emergency care to save the person's life, the basic principles of care of acute SCI must be observed if major complications are to be avoided. Actions taken during this short window of opportunity may determine the success of both short-and long-term outcomes. Because even small errors in care can lead to rehabilitation-halting or even fatal complications, recommendations in this guideline reflect both ''best practice'' clinical experience and established research evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spinal Cord MedicineSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207