MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16814: A miRNA Signature of the Failing Right Ventricle

2011· article· en· W45107186 on OpenAlexaff
Roxane Paulin, Gopinath Sutendra, Peter Dromparis, Sébastien Bonnet, Evangelos D. Michelakis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentriclemicroRNASignature (topology)CardiologyRight heartInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Right Ventricular Failure (RVF) is the most important prognostic structure for both morbidity and mortality in pulmonary hypertension (PHT) but remains understudied compared to the left ventricle (LV). Many differences (including embryologic origin) separate the 2 ventricles and the transition from a compensated to decompensated stage occurs much earlier in the RV vs the LV, in response to pressure overload. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as important determinants of LV development and failure, but nothing is known about RV miRNAs. We hypothesized that specific miRNAs signatures may characterize the transition from the fetal to adult and from a compensated (CRV) to a decompensated (DRV) RV. METHODS/RESULTS: We studied free RV wall tissue from neonatal (Neo) and rats with normal RV function (NRV, RVSP=38±2 mmHg, CO=102±2 ml/min and RV/LV+Septum=22±1), CRV (RVSP=66±8 mmHg, CO=80±13 ml/min, RV/LV+Septum=48±3, 2-3 weeks post-monocrotaline) and DRV (RVSP=52±2 mmHg, CO=67±10 ml/min, RV/LV+Septum=58±2, ascites, weight loss, 4-6 weeks post monocrotaline) (n=6 in each group). We used Taqman Low Density Arrays to study the expression of 377 miRNAs. Neonates were separated clearly from other samples in both principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis. 14 miRNAs were identified as differentially expressed between CRV, DRV and NRV (ANOVA applied on fold-change obtained after standard normalization procedures were performed (U6, median, quantile)). Among them, 7 showed a different pattern of expression compared to published data on LV hypertrophy: miR-200b, -132, -338-3p, -328, -155, -92a and -208. miR-208 has received attention as critical regulator of LVH. We showed that 208 decreased in CRV and DRV compared to NRV, whereas its expression is not known to decrease in LVH. This was confirmed by individual qRT-PCR and miR-208 levels were also found to negatively correlate with RV size (r=-0.72, n=20, p<0.001) as failure progresses. CONCLUSION: Further exploration of this unique miRNA signature, compared to LV, may also open new avenues of investigation on RVF. Since miR-208 is cardiac specific and regulated differently compared to LVH, it may offer important clues on why the RV responds suboptimally to pressure overload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→