MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4513192

WiFi Overcast: Enabling True Mobility for Realtime Applications in the Enterprise

2009· article· en· W4513192 on OpenAlexaff
Nabeel Ahmed, Usman Ismail, David R. Cheriton

Bibliographic record

VenueDental survey · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvercastComputer scienceComputer networkMobile deviceQuality of serviceWorld Wide WebGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterprises are increasingly deploying Wireless LANs to provide mobile access to users in corporate offices. However, existing enterprise WLANs are far from being truly mobile. In particular, they do not adequately support continuous mobility, where users access the network on-the-go. Furthermore, WLANs that do provide continuous mobility support require client modifications, making them hard to deploy in practice [20]. In addition, with the growing interest in realtime applications such as voice and video, users are increasingly placing additional (QoS) demands on the network, which for inadequately designed WLANs, does not scale to large numbers of users [10]. In this paper, we propose Overcast, a novel WLAN architecture that targets scenarios demanding continuous mobility and real-time support for 802.11 clients. Overcast does not require client modifications and supports all 802.11 standards. Though Overcast borrows some features from prior WLAN designs, it improves on them by incorporating a novel RF mapping framework (proposed in [3]) for accurate online detection of RF interference. We describe the architecture of Overcast in detail and discuss our current efforts in realizing such a system on off-the-shelf commodity hardware. We also describe an example application of Overcast to highlight it’s usefulness in supporting realtime applications in continuously mobile user environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDental surveySame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207