MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4531093

Extraction of Disease-Treatment Semantic Relations from Biomedical Sentences

2010· article· en· W4531093 on OpenAlexaff
Oana Frunza, Diana Inkpen

Bibliographic record

VenueMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelationship extractionRelation (database)Semantic relationMeasure (data warehouse)Computer scienceNatural language processingFocus (optics)Artificial intelligenceSemantics (computer science)Information retrievalInformation extractionData miningMedicineProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes our study on identifying semantic relations that exist between diseases and treatments in biomedical sentences. We focus on three semantic relations: Cure, Prevent, and Side Effect. The contributions of this paper consists in the fact that better results are obtained compared to previous studies and the fact that our research settings allow the integration of biomedical and medical knowledge. We obtain 98.55 % F-measure for the Cure relation, 100 % F-measure for the Prevent relation, and 88.89 % F-measure for the Side Effect relation. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeeting of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207