The experience of return migration: Caribbean perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experience of return: Caribbean return migrants, Dennis Conway, Robert B. Potter and Joan Phillips The socio-demographic characteristics of second generation return migrants to St Lucia and Barbados, Robert B. Potter 'Tales of Two Societies': narratives of adjustment among second generation return migrants to St. Lucia and Barbados, Robert B. Potter Incorporating race and gender into Caribbean return migration: the example of second generation 'Bajan-Brits', Joan Phillips and Robert B. Potter The Nexus and the family tree: return migration to Grenada and transnationalism in context, Joseph Rodman and Dennis Conway My 'Motherland' or 'My Mother's Land'? return migration and the experience of young British-Trinidadians, Marina Lee-Cunin No place like home: returnee R & R (retention and rejection) in the Caribbean homeland, Roger-Nark De Souza Return migration to Trinidad and Tobago: motives, consequences and the prospects of remigration, Godfrey St. Bernard A gendered tale of Puetro Rican return: place, nation and identity, Gena M. Perez Landscaping Englishness: the postcolonial predicament of returnees in Mandeville, Jamaica, Heather A. Horst Transatlantic French Caribbean connections: return migration in the context of increasing circulation between France and the Islands, Stephanie Condon Expressions of migrant mobilities among Caribbean migrants in Toronto, Canada, David Timothy Duval Transnationalism and return: 'Home' as an enduring fixture and 'Anchor', Dennis Conway Experiencing Caribbean return: societal contributions, adaptions and frustrations, Robert B. Potter and Dennis Conway Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".