Dificultades para el adecuado control glucémico del paciente diabético
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rosenstock J, Ziman B, Murphy L J, Clernent SC, Moore P, Bowebng CK, Hendler R, Lan, SP, Cafalu WT. Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center at MedicaJ City, Dallas, Texas; Universgy of Toronto y Sarnuel Lunenfeld Research Institute del Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario+ Canada; University ef Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitobe, Canada; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Austin Diagnostic Clinic, Austin, Texas; University ot Alberta y Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AIberta, Canada; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, y Ptizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut, y Pennington Biomedieal Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana Inhaled insulin impreves glycem~c ontrol when substituted for or added to oral combination therapy in type 2 diabetes, Ann Intern Med 2005;143:549-58 Generalidades. Los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 que no consiguen el control glucemico con terapeutica oral necesitan fina+mente insulina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".