MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W46291339

加拿大贸易投资机会有多少————加拿大制造商和出口商协会资深副总裁Jayson Myers博士访谈录

2006· article· zh· W46291339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
黄荣烽, 吴雨青

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

能源问题一直是中国经济界谈论的一大热点,也是世界其他国家全球战略的关键问题。加拿大作为一个资源大国.一直受到中国、美国、印度等国家的关注。记者就中加的能源贸易,以及能源贸易相关产业的商业问题.采访了“加拿大制造商和出口商协会”(Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters,1871年成立,是目前加拿大最大的商业协会,其成员占有加拿大75%的制造业和90%的出口量)资深副总裁兼首席经济学家、Jayson Myers博士。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunyatseniSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207