MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cross-Education of Strength Depends on Limb Dominance

2009· review· en· W46376798 on OpenAlexafffund
Jonathan P. Farthing

Bibliographic record

VenueExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTransfer (computing)Dominance (genetics)Upper limbStrength trainingPsychologyPhysical therapyMedicineComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Cross-education of strength is much greater when the dominant arm is trained in right-handed individuals. This asymmetry of strength transfer in the upper limbs is similar to what has been shown for skill transfer between limbs. The discussion focuses on the connection between transfer of strength and skills and the potential for cross-education to be used during recovery from unilateral injury. Cross-education of strength is greater after training the dominant limb, which suggests a connection between strength transfer and skill transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExercise and Sport Sciences ReviewsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207