Case 1: Sounds like trouble
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-year-old boy was brought to his paediatrician for noisy respiration and difficulty breathing during sleep. He had a history of loud snoring and difficulty breathing, which had worsened over the past six to eight months. His sleep was described as restless, and the parents indicated they had observed obstructive apneas in which breathing efforts continued but the snoring stopped for a few seconds. Trials of oral antibiotics and nasal steroids had not resolved the problem. The child was born at 29 weeks' gestation as the second of triplets. He had had bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphies, but no long-term sequelae of preterm birth had become apparent. Physical examination performed during wakefulness revealed a child in no distress but was remarkable for tonsillar hypertrophy and mouth breathing. There was nasal congestion, and breath sounds were equal and clear. The cardiac examination was normal, with weight just above the 5th percentile for corrected age. A lateral neck radiograph documented adenoidal enlargement. A test was performed that confirmed the child's diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".