MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automated Doppler Broadening of Cross Sections for Neutron Transport Applications

2014· article· en· W466625 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shane Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychiatric Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron transportOak Ridge National LaboratoryCross section (physics)Monte Carlo methodScatteringNeutronDoppler broadeningNuclear engineeringNeutron scatteringNuclear dataInterpolation (computer graphics)Doppler effectPhysicsNeutron temperatureNuclear physicsResearch reactorComputer scienceEngineeringOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation discusses the research and development of new cross section temperature handling techniques for the SCALE computer code, which is developed and maintained at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In particular, methods will be added to the KENO Monte Carlo code. Areas of interest include: neutron scattering off of heavy isotopes in the epithermal energy range, implementation of Doppler pre-broadening of continuous energy onedimensional cross-section data, implementation of interpolation on the continuous energy two-dimensional cross sections, and implementation of the direct S(α, β) [S alpha beta] method for thermal neutron scattering and interpolation on that data. Accurate cross section scattering off of heavy isotopes is crucial for accurate neutronics modeling and simulation of actual reactor cores during operational conditions. Scattering off of heavy isotopes such as U [Uranium 238] will have a greater impact on core neutronics behavior as reactor temperatures increase. Ensuring that the cross-section data used by Monte Carlo codes is obtained at the correct temperature will allow more accurate modeling of operating reactors that do not operate at current cross-section library temperatures. A review of the current approaches used for scattering and Doppler broadening was performed, and the current limitations of these approaches were examined. By examining the limitations of current approaches, new methods were developed and implemented into KENO. First, the Doppler Broadened Rejection Correction algorithm was added to KENO to allow for more accurate scattering off of heavy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychiatric Association JournalSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207