MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W46785149

Teaching with the Records of Early English Drama

2009· article· en· W46785149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roslyn L. Knutson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedieval & Renaissance drama in England · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaMemorandumHistoryLiteratureArtArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teaching with the Records of Early English Drama, edited by Elza C. Tiner. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press, 2006. Pp. xxvii + 238. Cloth $75.00. Reviewer: Roslyn L. Knutson At the University of Arkansas at Little Rock library, the REED volumes stand on their shelves in an unbroken phalanx of big red books. Some years ago, I xeroxed sample documents, all from York: the 1433 inventory of the Judgment from the Mercers' pageant documents, payments to professional players in 1593 and 1607, an entry from the town memorandum book in 1417 assigning sites around town for the wagons and scaffolds, and an entry in translation from the memorandum book in 1431-32 ratifying the transfer of the Herod play from the Goldsmiths to the Masons. I passed these out in my undergraduate class, English Renaissance Drama 4321, along with SallyBeth MacLean's map of touring routes,1 and talked for awhile about the REED project and its impact on theater history. I ran out of time, of course; and my comments had no appreciable effect on my students' understanding of medieval drama and the scholarly revolution precipitated by REED data. More recently, I have cut the handouts to the map and inventory, which I now accompany with a quasi- translation, that is, an excerpt from the middle of the document in modern type with bracketed glosses for the most unfamiliar words. This reduction takes less time in class but yields no better results. Since I've been presenting this REED material, I know of only one student who has gone to the library on his own initiative to consult one of the volumes. But all this is about to change. Fortuitously, I will be teaching the everybody-but-Shakespeare course again at University of Arkansas at Little Rock in the spring of 2008, and I will redesign the opening two weeks to incorporate what I have learned from essays in Teaching with the Records of Early English Drama, edited by Elza C. Tiner. The only problem I have now is choosing among the wealth of superb ideas offered therein. Teaching with the Records of Early English Drama contains thirteen essays that provide pedagogical advice for assignments in theater history, performance, dramatic and nondramatic literature, social history, and linguistics. The contributors address a variety of academic settings in departments in the humanities, including large sophomore-level lecture sections, enrollmentlimited senior seminars, and graduate courses; the contributions also embrace the diversity of students in the spectrum of institutions represented by my own satellite campus in a land-grant university system to premier private universifies in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. There are appendixes to each essay with specific assignments. In addition, there is a reference section by Rosalind Conklin Hays meant to allay the anxiety of working with nonliterary records for those only vaguely familiar with civic, guild, ecclesiastical, and legal documents. Editor Tiner provides an introduction, bibliography, and index. In section 1, Vital Evidence: Theatre History, Alexandra F. Johnston offers an exercise on provincial authence members, and David Mills focuses on the city of Chester and its Whitsun plays. For her exercise, Johnston creates three people who represent Tudor provincial life in class, gender, and vocation. One portrait is based on the real-life John Bachiler, a mercer of York who actually was a pageant master for his guild in 1536 and 1537. She invents additional details such as his membership in the city council and connections in trade with the Low Countries. A second portrait is the wholly fictitious Robert Millington, a gentleman to whom Johnston gives a provenance of Eton in 1550 (when Nicholas Udall was headmaster), King's College Cambridge in 1554, and connections with various noble households and Elizabeth's court. The third is the also fictitious Jane White, to whom Johnston assigns an early life in Reading but a later move to Shrewsbury with her husband in 1538. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedieval & Renaissance drama in EnglandSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207