Health Behaviors of Nursing Students: A Longitudinal Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To ascertain the degree to which a health science curriculum may influence health-related behaviors among students, nine selected health behaviors of 52 undergraduate nursing students were studied for 3 consecutive years and compared to those of a similar group of education students. In addition, the health behaviors of both student groups were compared to those of the general population. During the study, the nursing students had no significant alterations in the observed health behaviors, and no significant differences were observed between the health behaviors of the two groups of students. Both groups manifested certain health behaviors that were significantly different from the general population. However, nursing students were observed more frequently to be significantly different from the general population. A 3-year nursing curriculum may have facilitated the adoption of some personal health behaviors, but the time demands of academic life may have induced students to reduce time-consuming health behaviors, such as getting enough sleep, eating breakfast, and exercising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it