MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4689555

The Role of Visual Representation in the Assessment of Learning.

2004· article· en· W4689555 on OpenAlex
Lynn Sanders Bustle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual artsPoetryPsychologyPaintingRepresentation (politics)Pencil (optics)ArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Routine testing of all blood donations for hepatitis B antigen by counter-immunoelectrophoresis was started in April 1971. The frequency of HBAg carriers among apparently healthy volunteer blood donors in the Toronto Centre of the Canadian Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service was 15 in 10,000 with a male:female ratio of 6:1. Excluding penitentiary inmates, the highest incidence was among young, male, non-Anglo-Saxon city dwellers.A system of notification of HBAg-positive donors was developed, through which a carrier is referred to a special clinic for clinical and pathological evaluation.A survey of hospital patients indicated an incidence of HB antigen 3.5 times that of our healthy donor population. A comparison of the number of post-transfusion hepatitis cases occurring before and after the commencement of routine testing for HBAg showed a marked reduction in reported cases in 1971.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it