Ecology and behaviour of the ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The volume is a complex treatment of coccinellid biology, ecology and behaviour, mostly related to their valuable role in the control of sucking pest insects, such as aphids and coccids. To cover all progress of coccinellid research in most expert depth, 14 leading specialists from Canada, Czech Republic, England, Poland, Sweden and the United States became authors. Both the classical topics (food relations, distribution in habitats, impact on prey, parasitoids and diseases, the role in biological control) and the recently intensively developing disciplines such as genetics, regulation of behaviour by the recently discovered semiochemical molecules and intraguild interactions, are covered. While aimed at researchers, university teachers and agricultural entomologists, the book is readable for others who just have a liking for these interesting and attractive insects. The editors and authors hope that the surveyed knowledge will enable a further substantial progress in the state-of-art of modern fields of augmentation and conservation biological control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it