MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MOVING VEHICLE DETECTION USING A SINGLE SET OF QUICKBIRD IMAGERY — AN INITIAL STUDY

2006· article· en· W47205 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Zhang, Zhen Xiong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanchromatic filmComputer scienceComputer visionMultispectral imageArtificial intelligenceFrame (networking)Position (finance)Set (abstract data type)Remote sensingSatelliteGeographyTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moving vehicle detection has become increasingly important in transportation management and road infrastructure development. State-of-the-art moving vehicle detection techniques require multi-frame images or at least a stereo pair of aerial photos for moving information extraction. This paper presents a new technique to detect moving vehicles using just one single set of QuickBird imagery, instead of using airborne multi-frame or stereo images. To find out the moving information of a vehicle, we utilize the unnoticeable time delay between multspectral and panchromatic bands of the QuickBird (or Ikonos) imagery. To achieve an acceptable accuracy of speed and location information, we first employ a refined satellite geometric sensor model to precisely register QuickBird multispectral and panchromatic bands, and then use a new mathematic model developed in our research to precisely calculate the ground position and moving speed of vehicles detected in the image. The initial testing results demonstrate that the technique developed in this research can extract information on position, speed, and moving direction of a vehicle at a reasonable accuracy. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryFrench-language works237,207