Species Composition of Bird Communities in Shade Coffee Plantations in the Venezuelan Andes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen. – Avifauna de cafetales de sombra en los Andes de Venezuela. – Estudiamos la avifauna ylas caracteristicas del habitat de cafetales de sombra en los Andes venezolanos. Encontramos marcadasdiferencias en la composicion de especies entre las plantaciones de ambas vertientes de la Cordillera deMerida. Los cafetales de la vertiente occidental tuvieron una riqueza de especies mayor que aquellos de lavertiente oriental. La frecuencia con la cual las aves usaron el estrato del cafe vario notoriamente entre lossitios de estudio, lo cual puede reflejar las diferencias en la estructura del paisaje que rodea a los cafetales.Algunos arboles del dosel son elementos importantes del habitat tanto para las especies residentes comopara las migratorias invernales. Dos tercios de las especies registradas durante nuestro estudio fueronobservadas usando Erythrina poeppigiana , de las cuales cerca de la mitad fueron observadas explorando acti-vamente y probando flores abiertas. Los resultados de este estudio sugieren que los cafetales de sombra enVenezuela pueden ser un habitat favorable para especies residentes y migratorias invernales. La calidad delhabitat puede incrementarse por la presencia de especies de arboles tales como
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it