Species Composition of Bird Communities in Shade Coffee Plantations in the Venezuelan Andes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen.-Avifauna de cafetales de sombra en los Andes de Venezuela.-Estudiamos la avifauna y las características del hábitat de cafetales de sombra en los Andes venezolanos.Encontramos marcadas diferencias en la composición de especies entre las plantaciones de ambas vertientes de la Cordillera de Mérida.Los cafetales de la vertiente occidental tuvieron una riqueza de especies mayor que aquellos de la vertiente oriental.La frecuencia con la cual las aves usaron el estrato del café varió notoriamente entre los sitios de estudio, lo cual puede reflejar las diferencias en la estructura del paisaje que rodea a los cafetales.Algunos árboles del dosel son elementos importantes del hábitat tanto para las especies residentes como para las migratorias invernales.Dos tercios de las especies registradas durante nuestro estudio fueron observadas usando Erythrina poeppigiana, de las cuales cerca de la mitad fueron observadas explorando activamente y probando flores abiertas
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".