Octreotide Treatment of Massive Hemorrhage due to Cytomegalovirus Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated colitis can result in abdominal pain, diarrhea, significant blood loss and perforation. The standard therapy for CMV colitis includes supportive measures and antiviral medications. Severe hemorrhage due to CMV colitis often necessitates surgical resection. We present a case of a patient who was undergoing chemotherapy for acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and developed significant abdominal pain and diarrhea followed by massive hematochezia. Colonoscopy showed numerous actively bleeding deep ulcers in the cecum. A provisional diagnosis of CMV colitis was made and she was started on ganciclovir. Histological assessment confirmed the diagnosis of CMV colitis. She continued to bleed profusely per rectum over the following five days, passing up to 1 L to 1.5 L of blood per day. She required 10 units of packed red blood cells over this time period. The patient refused surgical intervention and after discussion of possible options, octreotide was instituted. Her blood loss stopped almost immediately and she required no further transfusions. She tolerated the medication well and was discharged home at a later date in stable condition. This is the first reported case of the use of octreotide in the treatment of massive hematochezia from CMV colitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".