MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The glycerol 3‐phosphate acyltransferases Gat1p and Gat2p are microsomal phosphoproteins with differential contributions to polarized cell growth

2009· article· en· W48380745 on OpenAlexafffund
Vanina Zaremberg, A. Álvarez, David P. Burrowes, Martin W. Bratschi, J. Cheung, Adam Kulaga, Jennifer Kearley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAcyltransferasesBiochemistryAcyltransferaseEnzymeOrganelleCell fractionationCell biologyYeastMetabolic pathwaySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSubcellular localizationPhosphateBiologyPhosphorylationChemistryBiosynthesisCytoplasm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycerol‐3‐phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) catalyses the initial commited step in the synthesis of all glycerolipids. It is a redundant step in yeast, mammals and plants. S. cerevisiae possesses two GPATs, encoded by GAT1 and GAT2. Metabolic analysis of yeast lacking either GAT1 or GAT2 indicated partitioning of the two main branches of phospholipid synthesis at the initial and rate limiting GPAT step. We are interested in identifying molecular determinants mediating lipid metabolic pathway partitioning, thus as a start point we have performed a detailed study of Gat1p and Gat2p cellular localization. We have compared Gat1p and Gat2p localization by fluorescence microscopy and subcellular fractionation using equilibrium density gradients. Our results indicate i) Gat1p and Gat2p mostly overlap in their localization and are in fact microsomal GPATs, and ii) there is a differential enrichment of Gat1p and Gat2p in distinct ER fractions. Overexpression of these enzymes in the absence of endogenous GPATs, induces proliferation of distinct ER arrays, differentially affecting cortical ER morphology and polarized cell growth. In addition, our studies also uncovered a dynamic post‐translational regulation of Gat1p and Gat2p, and a compensation mechanism through phosphorylation that responds to cellular GPAT imbalance. This work has been supported by a grant from NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207