MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W484519832 · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.200663

3rd Quarter RIN Update

2014· article· en· W484519832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Paulson

Bibliographic record

VenueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSAS software applications and methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandateQuarter (Canadian coin)Statutory lawStock (firearms)Identification (biology)Range (aeronautics)BusinessEconomicsAccountingActuarial scienceEngineeringPolitical scienceLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today’s article provides an update on Renewable Identification Numbers by looking at estimates for RIN carry-in and generation numbers for 2014 based on available data through October from EPA’s EMTS. There still exists a significant amount of uncertainty regarding actual mandate levels for 2014 in light of the EPA’s recent announcement that the finalization of rules for 2014 will be delayed into 2015. This post examines the range of 2015 RIN stock scenarios that could occur assuming the final mandate levels range somewhere between proposed and statutory levels for 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1650.194

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Same topicSAS software applications and methodsFrench-language works237,207